Now, obviously, the richer you get the less you need the personal exemption...when you make $200,000/year there is no risk of not being able to afford to eat. Accordingly, the IRS phased-out the amount of the personal exemption one could claim on their federal taxes as their income increased. For example, in 2009, the personal exemption was $3,650 but, for couples filing jointly whose adjusted gross income exceeded $372,700 the personal exemption was reduced to $2,433.
It is only a $1,217 difference, which at the maximum marginal tax rate would only amount to a little over $400 per person. Hardly a drop in the bucket for a couple making $372,700/year.
![](https://blogger.googleusercontent.com/img/b/R29vZ2xl/AVvXsEiFgeJLgpunL_9DfwVolsbjczq9uE2gL9vQmNqCY_upqNsVWHzdhQqnt7UTYV_mt_IQzdyOhSgIBtF4TqoCnrdjFXM84lqGJRPl9HaOSH2IpUVC6phR6Y-0iWHo3c6ArcEibkPUPVqQfzc/s320/monopoly2.jpg)
But the personal exemption phaseout was eliminated under President Bush's 2001 tax reforms...effective 2010. Besides ignoring the intent of the personal exemption, were the richest 1% of Americans really hurting for $400?
Fortunately, this is one tax cut for the rich that won't be sticking around: the budget proposals for 2011 restore the personal exemption phaseout. I hope they spent their one-time $400 windfall wisely.
1 comment:
Kelly - are you still on Japan? Was just browsing around and saw your posts. I hope you and your wife are doing well.
Post a Comment